Red vs Miss Worth
A side-by-side read of the two reference entries: house, year, market position, accords and note pyramids — then how much material they actually share.
8Shared notes
6Shared accords
46Overlap score
Side by side
| Red | Miss Worth | |
|---|---|---|
| House | Giorgio Beverly Hills | Worth |
| Launched | 1989 | 1977 |
| Marketed as | women | women |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Dominant family | Woody | Woody |
| Community rating | 3.88/5 (1,198) | 4.26/5 (81) |
| Top accords | woody amber floral warm spicy | woody fruity warm spicy sweet |
| Top notes | Cherry Aldehydes Ylang-Ylang Hyacinth Div.Celtra-Ad-V3 { Display: None !Important | Aldehydes Peach Black Currant Lily-Of-The-Valley Ylang-Ylang |
| Heart notes | Carnation Tuberose Rose Rosemary Jasmine | Clove Orchid Rose Cypress Violet |
| Base notes | Oakmoss Amber Myrhh Sandalwood Olibanum | Benzoin Oak Moss Musk Amber Virginia Cedar |
| Recorded notes | 24 | 30 |
The two share 8 recorded notes (Aldehydes, Amber, Carnation, Jasmine, Lily-Of-The-Valley, Rose, Sandalwood, Tonka Bean) and 6 accords (amber, aromatic, floral, fruity, sweet, warm spicy). Material overlap score: 46 points.
Where they differ
Red adds Cedar Cherry Div.Celtra-Ad-V3 { Display: None !Important Gardenia Hyacinth Iris. Miss Worth adds African Orange Flower Anise Benzoin Bergamot Black Currant Caraway.
Both entries
See also: perfumes similar to Red · perfumes similar to Miss Worth.