KYOTO vs Ecstasy
A side-by-side read of the two reference entries: house, year, market position, accords and note pyramids — then how much material they actually share.
1Shared notes
6Shared accords
26Overlap score
Side by side
| KYOTO | Ecstasy | |
|---|---|---|
| House | Diptyque | Tiziana Terenzi |
| Launched | 2021 | 2012 |
| Marketed as | unisex | unisex |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Dominant family | Floral | Woody |
| Community rating | 3.97/5 (554) | 3.75/5 (1,136) |
| Top accords | rose earthy woody aromatic | woody amber aromatic balsamic |
| Top notes | Beetroot Turkish Rose Vetiver Incense | Spruce Pine Tree Pebbles |
| Heart notes | — | Incense Rose Patchouli Violet |
| Base notes | — | Soil Tincture Woody Notes Amber Labdanum Sandalwood |
| Recorded notes | 4 | 13 |
The two share 1 recorded notes (Incense) and 6 accords (amber, aromatic, balsamic, earthy, rose, smoky). Material overlap score: 26 points.
Where they differ
KYOTO adds Beetroot Turkish Rose Vetiver. Ecstasy adds Amber Labdanum Patchouli Pebbles Pine Tree Rose.
Both entries
See also: perfumes similar to KYOTO · perfumes similar to Ecstasy.