Touch vs Miss Worth
A side-by-side read of the two reference entries: house, year, market position, accords and note pyramids — then how much material they actually share.
7Shared notes
6Shared accords
38Overlap score
Side by side
| Touch | Miss Worth | |
|---|---|---|
| House | Burberry | Worth |
| Launched | 1998 | 1977 |
| Marketed as | women | women |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Dominant family | Fruity | Woody |
| Community rating | 3.66/5 (2,683) | 4.26/5 (81) |
| Top accords | fruity woody white floral fresh | woody fruity warm spicy sweet |
| Top notes | Red Pepper Cassia Blackberry Black Currant Cranberry | Aldehydes Peach Black Currant Lily-Of-The-Valley Ylang-Ylang |
| Heart notes | Lily Peony Peach Lily-Of-The-Valley Jasmine | Clove Orchid Rose Cypress Violet |
| Base notes | Cedar Oakmoss Vanilla Green Almond Tonka Bean | Benzoin Oak Moss Musk Amber Virginia Cedar |
| Recorded notes | 19 | 30 |
The two share 7 recorded notes (Black Currant, Jasmine, Lily-Of-The-Valley, Peach, Raspberry, Tonka Bean, Tuberose) and 6 accords (aromatic, floral, fresh, fruity, sweet, warm spicy). Material overlap score: 38 points.
Where they differ
Touch adds Blackberry Cassia Cedar Cranberry Green Almond Lily. Miss Worth adds African Orange Flower Aldehydes Amber Anise Benzoin Bergamot.
Both entries
See also: perfumes similar to Touch · perfumes similar to Miss Worth.