Baby Touch vs Yes Am Women
A side-by-side read of the two reference entries: house, year, market position, accords and note pyramids — then how much material they actually share.
4Shared notes
6Shared accords
26Overlap score
Side by side
| Baby Touch | Yes Am Women | |
|---|---|---|
| House | Burberry | Cacharel |
| Launched | 2002 | 2018 |
| Marketed as | unisex | women |
| Concentration | — | — |
| Dominant family | Sweet & Gourmand | Sweet & Gourmand |
| Community rating | 4.07/5 (629) | 3.93/5 (4,414) |
| Top accords | lactonic citrus green vanilla | sweet vanilla fruity lactonic |
| Top notes | Lemon Verbena Mint Rhubarb Div.Celtra-Ad-V3 { Display: None !Important | Raspberry Mandarin Orange Bergamot Lemon |
| Heart notes | Cyclamen Orange Blossom Lily-Of-The-Valley Jasmine | Gardenia Ginger Flower Amber Jasmine Orange Blossom |
| Base notes | Milk Vanilla Moss | Milk Caramel Vanilla Cardamom Licorice |
| Recorded notes | 11 | 19 |
The two share 4 recorded notes (Jasmine, Milk, Orange Blossom, Vanilla) and 6 accords (aromatic, citrus, fruity, lactonic, sweet, vanilla). Material overlap score: 26 points.
Where they differ
Baby Touch adds Cyclamen Div.Celtra-Ad-V3 { Display: None !Important Lemon Verbena Lily-Of-The-Valley Mint Moss. Yes Am Women adds Amber Amberwood Benzoin Bergamot Caramel Cardamom.
Both entries
See also: perfumes similar to Baby Touch · perfumes similar to Yes Am Women.